Can survey design reduce anchoring bias in recall data? Evidence from smallholder farmers in Malawi

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date Issued

Date Online

2024-11-06

Citation

Godlonton, Susan; Hernandez, Manuel A.; and Paz, Cynthia. 2024. European Review of Agricultural Economics 51(4): 1129–1167. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbae026

Abstract/Description

Recall biases in retrospective self-reported survey data have important implications for empirical research. We leverage the survey design literature and test three strategies to attenuate mental anchoring in retrospective data collection: question ordering, retrieval cues and aggregate (community) anchoring. We focus on maize production and happiness reports among smallholder farmers in Malawi. Asking for retrospective before concurrent data on average reduces recall bias (i.e. the deviation of the recalled versus the concurrent outcome reported in the previous period) by 34 per cent for maize production, a meaningful improvement with no increase in data collection costs. Retrieval cues are less successful and community anchors can exacerbate the bias. None of the strategies help to ease the recall bias for happiness reports.

Permanent link to cite or share this item

External link to download this item

Author ORCID identifiers

Organizations Affiliated to the Authors

Share

Review Status

Peer Review

Language

en

Countries

Access Rights

Open Access Open Access

Usage Rights

CC-BY-4.0

Attention