Are we done yet? Response fatigue and rural livelihoods

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centre
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Markets
cg.contributor.donorInternational Initiative for Impact Evaluation
cg.coverage.countryGhana
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2GH
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionSub-saharan Africa
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africa
cg.creator.identifierKate Ambler: 0000-0001-6277-0930
cg.creator.identifierSylvan Herskowitz: 0000-0003-3758-4524
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134183
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Markets, Trade, and Institutions Division
cg.identifier.publicationRankNot ranked
cg.number1980
cg.placeWashington, DC
cg.reviewStatusInternal Review
dc.contributor.authorAmbler, Kate
dc.contributor.authorHerskowitz, Sylvan
dc.contributor.authorMaredia, Karim M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T12:15:07Zen
dc.date.available2024-05-22T12:15:07Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/143565
dc.titleAre we done yet? Response fatigue and rural livelihoodsen
dcterms.abstractAccurate understanding of peoples’ livelihoods activities is needed to inform effective policy. Existing evidence relies heavily on studies that use designated respondents to provide information about their household members, imposing significant costs on these respondents along with possible distortions in the data. In rural Ghana, we randomize the order that household members are asked about and estimate that response fatigue leads to undercounting of labor activities by 8% on average. Women are twice as impacted as men while youth are four times as impacted as older adults, distorting both within-household and population wide comparisons. These biases result from women and youth being listed systematically later in rosters and stronger effects of fatigue for them, conditional on roster position. The implications of our results extend to other topics of enquiry as well, wherever similar repetitive survey structures are deployed, such as birth records, plot-level inputs, and household consumption and expenditures.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAmbler, Kate; Herskowitz, Sylvan; and Maredia, Mywish. 2020. Are we done yet? Response fatigue and rural livelihoods. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1980. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134183.en
dcterms.extent46 p.
dcterms.isPartOfIFPRI Discussion Paperen
dcterms.issued2020-12-01
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dcterms.relationhttps://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133739en
dcterms.relationhttps://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134694en
dcterms.relationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102736en
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/134183
dcterms.subjectgenderen
dcterms.subjectsurveysen
dcterms.subjecthouseholdsen
dcterms.subjectemploymenten
dcterms.subjectyouthen
dcterms.subjectlabouren
dcterms.subjectlivelihoodsen
dcterms.subjectrural areasen
dcterms.subjectmethodologyen
dcterms.typeWorking Paper

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
134394.pdf
Size:
416.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Discussion Paper