Institutional options for managing rangelands

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date Issued

Date Online

Language

en

Review Status

Internal Review

Access Rights

Open Access Open Access

Share

Citation

CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi). 2010. Institutional options for managing rangelands. In Resources, rights, and cooperation: A sourcebook on property rights and collective action for sustainable development, CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi). Property Rights and Collective Action for Natural Resource Management, Chapter 3, Pp. 93-98. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154585

Permanent link to cite or share this item

External link to download this item

DOI

Abstract/Description

Rangelands occupy nearly one-half of the Earth's land area or around 16 billion acres. About one-half of this area is used for grazing livestock. Rangelands have been subject to a wide range of tenure arrangements, with different structures for regulating access to, use of, and management of rangelands. These include many customary and tribal institutional arrangements that have functioned for long periods. Each of these property rights regimes and institutional options is associated with different costs for achieving various goals, such as poverty reduction, equitable access to resources, and sustainable use and management of those resources. The benefits and costs of alternative tenure and institutional arrangements and the impact of existing legal and policy frameworks on the sustainability and equity of pastoral production systems vary depending on the category of land ownership: state ownership; individual ownership; or common property